By now, the Russian military’s involvement in the ongoing Syrian
Civil War is not breaking news. The facts have been properly laid down and
conveyed to the watching world with reports that are verified, and in some
cases, in a high-tech kind of delivery. What seems like a constant CCTV feed from
the skies and the seas has shown highly accurate weapons raining
down on the otherwise common enemy that is the Islamic State (IS).
What is perhaps interesting is how, predictably, the West
has downplayed the Russian effort, from spreading slanderous unconfirmed
reports of dead civilians to President Putin’s macho-man image reporting in the
Western mainstream media. Indeed, even for the West, especially in Washington,
the enemy of your enemy is still your enemy.
For one, John McCain, the Republican politician who
previously lost his presidential ambition to Obama back in 2008, and famous for
advocating
military aggression and political subversion, has recently shared his
hysterical interpretation of Moscow’s war against Islamic State in Syria.
In a chilling, Hollywood-style op-ed
published in CNN, McCain blamed the Obama administration’s weakness in
confronting its adversaries, most especially Russia. He sees Moscow’s bombing
of IS forces in Syria as just an effort to restore Russia’s image in the Middle
East. What he does not recognize, and most Americans perhaps, is the fact that
the spread of terrorism, which the United States helped foster in the first
place, is a major concern for Putin, as the countries plagued by extremism is really
not that far from Russia’s southern flanks.
He opined that Putin “must be stopped, not least because he
will inflame every aspect of this conflict in the process: the refugee crisis,
the mass atrocities and the growth of ISIS.” What McCain overlooked is the fact
that if it weren’t for his country’s intervention in the Syrian conflict, ISIS would’ve
not strengthened and spread in the Middle East. The fact is that these extremely
violent Islamists where the ‘moderate’ rebels they were supporting during
the early years of the so-called Arab Spring.
Washington’s brand of frenzied foreign policy is not generous
enough for McCain and his Republican panic crew: he’s called for “check(ing) Putin’s
ambitions…impose greater costs on Russia’s interests…by striking significant
Syrian leadership or military targets.” As a former military man himself, does
he understand the possible chain of events that might follow if the United
States directly attacked Syria’s military? He seems to have forgotten that
Washington’s involvement in Syria is not
authorized by the United Nations and thus is an illegal act under
international laws.
And then McCain indulges in more disgusting assault, calling
for more pressure against Russia ‘where it counts’ including sending more
weapons to Ukraine, spreading corruption exposes on the Russian leadership, and
even more sanctions against Moscow. He added that the US can find ‘willing
partners’ in Europe for another ‘coalition of the willing’ (or killing) to
further prop up the ‘moderate opposition.’ Finally, he called America’s
intervention as it’s ‘last opportunity to make a difference in Syria and avert
a strategic disaster…we cannot afford to squander.”
For their part, the Western mainstream media continues to
indulge in spreading and amplifying unconfirmed reports of the alleged victims
caused by the Russian expedition inside Syria. For instance, the reported civilian
casualties resulting from the Russian air campaign where actually spread even
before the first bomber sorties had even begun. Also, the purported landing
of Russian cruise missiles in Iran has been confirmed (by Tehran and Moscow) to
be just ‘part
of the intensified Western propaganda war.’
Such apocalyptic visions and mantra of ‘intervene-now-or-never’
runs contrary to what’s spewing out of the Kremlin. For their part since the beginning,
Russia has expressed interest in finding “pragmatic
ways to join efforts against the common threat.” Putin has expressed his
country’s interest in establishing a broad coalition to fight Islamic State, from
the simple sharing of intelligence (a proposal Washington rejected) to ending
the ‘training program’ of ‘moderate’ Syrian rebels in the ground. In fact, the
United States has airdropped
a fresh supply of weapons, some 50 tons of it, to support their Syrian
puppets.
Washington’s obsession with bringing poisoned ‘democracy’ A.K.A.
regime change to the Middle East should be stopped for good if the region
deserves to be in peace. It has been clear that the ‘must-go’ policy pursued by
the United States against Arab dictators has only worsened the situation. The quagmire
has exploded out of proportion that even Europe, with the present influx of
refugees to the continent, needed to tackle this otherwise non-issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment